You are hereHome >
Report: Reclaiming Our Democracy
Outside Spending, Outsized Influence
Super PACs, the newly created groups that can raise and spend unlimited funds in elections, spent over $5.9 million on Pennsylvania federal elections.
Nationwide, Super PACs raised 86% of funds from an elite set of ultra-wealthy donors and businesses giving $100,000 or more. Super PACs also received $101,749,662 from business corporations last year. Allowing special interests to fund attack ads on candidates distorts our democracy in an attempt to ensure that our elected officials put industry and out-of-state interests above the common good.
[Outside Spending: 501(c)(4) $3,997,585.18, 33.48%; 501(c)(6) $500,022.00, 4.19%; 527 $1,155,569.96, 9.68%; SuperPAC $5,925,672.01, 49.63%; 501(c)(5) Union $360,000.03, 3.02%; Total $11,938,849.18]
Dark money groups accounted for 37.67% of all outside spending in Pennsylvania House and Senate races. These groups do not disclose the source of their funds, hiding critical information from voters about who is behind the advertising and what interests are backing which candidates.
[Secret Spending: Secret: $4,497,607.18, 37.67%; Not Secret: $7,441,242.00, 62.33%]
Groups federally registered outside of Pennsylvania accounted for 95.24% of all outside spending in Pennsylvania House and Senate races. Out-of-state spenders are likely to put their own priorities ahead of the needs and interests of Pennsylvanians, thus skewing the relationships that Representatives and Senators have with their constituencies.
[Spending Origin: In-State $568,568.77, 4.76%; Out-of-State $11,370,280.41, 95.24%]
Read Billion-Dollar Democracy, our report on federal spending in the 2012 elections, here.
We're calling on big restaurant chains to stop the overuse of antibiotics on factory farms. Tell KFC to stop serving meat raised on routine antibiotics.
Your donation supports PennPIRG's work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.